 |
GREATDANELADY.COM Linda Arndt ~ Canine Nutritional Consultant Email:  |
 |
|
Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments |
|
NOTE: Not all of the links work in this article. To read the articles and have access to the links you need to go to the actual website itself - www.CancerTutor.com UPDATE 2011 : This is a supplement for humans and for pets (different labeling) that is an absolute MUST for anyone with Cancer going through chemo and/or radiation to prevent cellular DNA damage. Note in the instructions that come with this that it can't be given at the same time as Graviola and must be alternated if you are using both products. _________________________________________________________ Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments The Medicine Introduction Some people wonder why the scores of billions of dollars spent on the "War on Cancer," that President Nixon started in 1971/72, has not produced a cure for cancer. Have researchers been looking for more profitable treatments for cancer or have they been looking for cures for cancer? In fact, the average person knows almost nothing about either orthodox cancer treatments or alternative cancer treatments, outside of what they have heard on television or read in the media. If a survey were taken, the average person would probably think that the true cure rate of orthodox cancer treatments was 40% or more and the true cure rate for alternative cancer treatments was close to zero percent. This is total nonsense, but more will be said about that later in this article. Is what you know about cancer treatments based on who has the most truth, or is it based on who has the most money? Is what you know about cancer treatments carefully designed to deceive you? Are you being sold a "bill of goods?" This website is just as important for people who don't have cancer as it is for people who do have cancer. Why would someone who doesn't have cancer be concerned about the truth? The reason is that if they are diagnosed with cancer, their doctor will immediately put intense pressure on them to commit to chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Unless you know whether alternative cancer treatments or orthodox cancer treatments are superior, BEFORE YOU ARE DIAGNOSED, there is a 100% chance you will make the wrong decision. If you read all three parts of this article, you are assured of hearing many things that have never entered your mind before. You will read things that you will never, never hear on television or read in print. You will learn a lot about the techniques of deception that you are exposed to every day. You will learn things that the people of orthodox medicine don't want you to know. And all this information is free. Nothing is sold from this website. To visualize what is going on in the "cancer industry" today, and to see behind their massive facade, here is a short story that will describe how orthodox medicine currently treats cancer patients. A Story Suppose you own a nice, comfortable, $300,000 house in the country, near a small city. While you have gone to the store your house catches on fire. As you return home you see that two rooms of your house are in flames and the fire is spreading. You immediately call the fire department. Twenty minutes later three fire trucks show up. The men and women in the first fire truck pull out heavy suits and axes and run to the house and start cutting down parts of the house that have already burned, but are still smoldering. They furiously cut and cut and when they have cut out about 10% of the parts of the house that have already burned, they quit and go back to their fire truck. You note that they did absolutely nothing to stop the spreading of the fire. What they cut out wasn't even burning and it certainly had nothing to do with stopping the raging fire. You watch the men and women in the second fire truck pull out a fire hose and start spraying a powder on the fire. The amount of powder they were spraying did not seem to you to be enough to put out the fire. But you notice that while the powder is slowing down the spreading of the fire, it is also severely damaging the parts of the house that are not on fire. Puzzled, you ask the fireman what the powder is. They say it is a very toxic acid that is capable of putting the fire out, but they can't spray very much of it on the fire because if they did, the entire house would be reduced to a pile of rubble by the acid. Thus, all they can do is slow down the spreading of the fire, but they can't stop the spreading of the fire. Even more puzzled, you ask them why they did not bring water in their fire truck. They said that in firefighter school they were taught that water was useless in putting out house fires. They said that using water on a house fire is an old "wives tale" and water is not effective. They also said that the state firefighter's union would fire any firefighter that used water on a house fire. By sheer coincidence you are also aware that the federal regulatory agency, the Fire Development Administration (FDA), has researched water and has declared that water is an "unproven" method to put out house fires. The FDA says there is "insufficient evidence" as to water's effectiveness and safety. You silently mumble to yourself that there must be a huge connection between the FDA, the firefighter's union, the firefighter schools and the chemical companies. While you have been talking to the men and women in the second truck, five men have jumped out of the third fire truck. They ask you where the couch is in the living room. You point in the general direction of the couch in the living room, which you assume by now is on fire. Each of them immediately pulls out a 30-06 caliber rifle and starts shooting at the couch from where they are standing next to their fire truck. You scream at them and ask them what they are doing. They respond that they have been taught in firefighter's school that couches are very bad to have in a house during a fire, so they are trying to shoot the couch to pieces. They comment: "We think we are doing some good." You say that even if the couch is helping spread the fire, that they are blowing holes in the front and back of the house trying to shoot the couch to pieces from outside the house. Furthermore, very impatiently, you say the fire has already spread far beyond where the couch is located. While the spreading of the house fire did slow down because of the toxic acids, within two hours you no longer have a house. The fire men and women were quite proud that they slowed down the fire. They tell you that your house lasted an extra hour because of their work. You doubt the accuracy of that number. They give each other "high fives," get in their fire trucks, and head back to the fire station. Between the fire, the acid and the bullets, your house has been reduced to rubble. The cutting out of the wood that had already burned, by the first fire truck, had absolutely no affect on stopping the fire. In fact, nothing any of them did stopped the spreading of the fire, it only slowed it down. You are astonished at what you have seen. You ponder why the "investigative journalists" have not jumped on this situation. Then you realize how much money the chemical companies spend on television advertisements and you realize why the "investigative journalists" have kept their mouths shut. A week later, as you drive by the fire department, you notice that all of the cars in the parking lot are very expensive cars. A month later you know why they are driving very expensive cars. They have sent you a bill for their services: $100,000. But they note in the bill that the house insurance company will pay most of the bill. You are amazed when you look at your house insurance policy and realize the insurance company will not pay the bill if the fire department uses water. You ponder to yourself: "What is the connection between the fire department, the firefighter's union, the firefighter's school, the FDA, the insurance companies, the television stations and the chemical companies?" One thing is clear to you, you now know why all of your friends think the firefighters are heroes, the television stations constantly portray them as heros in their shows. As you research all of the connections between these organizations it quickly becomes clear to you that all of them are owned or controlled by very wealthy people who are very, very good friends with each other. You have a brand new comprehension of what quid pro quo means - you scratch my back and I'll scratch your back. You conclude that a quid pro quo of this magnitude is another term for "conspiracy." - End of Story The Explanation What has just been described is how "modern medicine" treats cancer that has already metastasized. Cancer can be compared to a fire. It is a fire that will spread until it kills you. But "modern medicine" does nothing that will put out the fire. The first fire truck represents surgery to cut out tumors or parts of the body where there are concentrations of cancer cells, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body! The third fire truck represents radiation, which is used to shrink tumors, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body! While the second fire truck represents chemotherapy, the "progress" chemotherapy is making is frequently judged by its ability to shrink tumors. Oncologists love to tell the cancer patient that their tumors are shrinking. But even if chemotherapy does slow down the progress of the cancer, and even if it puts cancer patients into remission, it is almost always a temporary Pyrrhic victory because the cancer almost always returns. The Food and Drug Administration (the real FDA) has approved scores of chemotherapy drugs, but none of them can stop the spread of cancer because chemotherapy drugs do not target cancer cells. There are scores of natural substances that do target cancer cells and can stop the spread of cancer. But the FDA has never approved a single one of these natural substances (natural substances cannot be patented by the pharmaceutical companies). Insurance companies will not pay for natural cancer treatments (i.e. alternative cancer treatments). The media never says anything good about alternative cancer treatments, but constantly glorifies the medical profession. Medical schools have not taught a single truthful thing about alternative cancer treatments in over 90 years. The Importance of the Spreading of Cancer "When a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the tumor. If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, "How is the tumor doing?" No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At autopsy we would hear, "Isn't that marvelous! The tumor is gone!" Yes, it was, but so was the patient. How many millions of times are we going to have to repeat these scenarios
before we realize that we are treating the wrong thing? There is nothing in surgery that will prevent the spread of cancer. There is nothing in radiation that will prevent the spread of the disease. There is nothing in chemotherapy that will prevent the spread of the disease. How do we know? Just look at the statistics! There is a statistic known as "survival time." Survival time is defined as that interval of time between when the diagnosis of cancer is first made in a given patient and when that patient dies from his disease. In the past fifty years, tremendous progress has been made in the
early diagnosis of cancer. In that period of time, tremendous progress
had been made in the surgical ability to remove tumors. Tremendous
progress has been made in the use of radiation and chemotherapy in
their ability to shrink or destroy tumors. But, the survival time
of the cancer patient today is no greater than it was fifty years
ago. What does this mean? It obviously means that we are treating
the wrong thing!" In other words, if the cancer has not spread from the tumor, the tumor presents no danger to the patient (with rare exceptions, such as when a tumor blocks the fluid in the common bile duct). It is important to understand that the vast majority of cells in a tumor are healthy cells. Cancer cells CANNOT form tissue. Thus, if the cancer were contained within the tumor, there would not be enough cancer cells in the person's body to endanger their life. Likewise, if a man had prostate cancer, and the cancer was contained inside the prostate gland, there could not be enough cancer cells inside the prostate gland to endanger the patient's life. Even if the cancer cells in a tumor were killed, or the tumor was cut out, it would not solve the problem of the spreading of the cancer if the cancer has already spread. There would be no benefit to the patient because it is the spreading of the cancer that kills cancer patients, not the cancer inside the tumor. Yet the focus of orthodox medicine is on shrinking the tumors. Chemotherapy (i.e. the second fire truck in the example) is so toxic to cancer patients that if they gave enough of it to a cancer patient to kill all of the cancer cells, the patient would die from the side-effects of the chemotherapy immediately. So doctors give chemotherapy in very low doses (though they seem like very high doses), not enough to actually cure you. In the mean time the cancer continues to spread. Chemotherapy may put a patient "in remission," but virtually every cancer patient who goes into remission eventually comes out of remission and later dies. Incredibly, doctors use radiation, the third fire truck, even after the cancer has started to spread. They are interested in shrinking a tumor. As mentioned above, the tumor is not the problem, it is the spreading of the cancer that is the problem. While orthodox medicine continues to use worthless treatments, that only temporarily slow down the spreading of the cancer, many cancer patients who use alternative cancer treatments fare no better. Many alternative medicine practitioners do not use the best cancer treatments. Either they have been trained to use the most profitable treatments, or they are simply interested in making as much money as possible as fast as possible. To make matters worse, vendors of natural supplements generally only sell their products, thus if they have a very weak product line, the patient probably isn't going to survive. When a person gets cancer, their chances of survival are virtually nil. If they go with orthodox medicine they are assured they will get the treatments discussed above. But even if they go with alternative medicine they are likely to get treatments that simply don't work. This leaves the cancer patient in a quandary. No matter which way they turn the only thing that is thriving is their cancer and their practitioners. But believe it or not, there is good news! While the pharmaceutical industry is in it for the money, Mother Nature isn't in it for money. And Mother Nature is a lot smarter than the chemists in the pharmaceutical industry. And there are some people in alternative medicine who are not getting rich treating cancer patients and they know how to cure the vast majority of cancer cases. And there are even a few vendors who have products that are strong enough for almost all cancer cases! This very long article, which is practically a small book in three parts, will walk the cancer patient, or their caregiver, through the mazes of deception that they have been exposed to all their life. This article is definitely NOT a treatment article. Absolutely do not use this article to put together a cancer treatment program. There are dozens of articles on this website that deal with treating cancer. But this article isn't one of them. When you are finished with this article, go to the home page of this website and the home page will walk you through the articles on treating cancer. But for now, let us discuss why so many cancer patients die. Introduction To The Key Issue - Integrity The issue of treating cancer has far more to do with integrity than it does with science. In fact, after several years of researching this very issue, it is clear to this author that treating cancer today has absolutely nothing to do with science. Nothing at all. Had scientists embraced the Brandt Grape Cure of the 1920s, and refined it as future discoveries in natural medicine were made, cancer would have been a footnote in the history books written in the 1940s. It is a fact that if every person who has lived on the Earth lived the Golden Rule, as it should be lived, cancer, and hundreds of other diseases, would currently be a footnote in history books. Here is a quote from the late Dr. Bob Beck, a PhD in physics, who spent 40 years of his life working in electromedicine: "When I looked into Dr. Kaali's work [Patent #5188738 describes
a cure for AIDS/HIV found at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine
in 1990], I decided to go ahead and fund it. We found that it worked
all of the time [at curing AIDS/HIV]. For two and a half years, we
gave full credit for this invention to Dr. Kaali, whose name is on
the patent. Then I discovered that there was a long history of this
technology. We followed a trail of these patents back 107 years! We
found a patent, #4665898, that cured all cancer, dated May 19, 1987.
Why has this been suppressed? Why hasn't your doctor told you about
an absolutely proven, established cure for cancer? The answer is that
doctors get $375,000 per patient for surgery, chemotherapy, x-ray,
hospital stays, doctors and anesthesiologists. This is the official
statistic from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Unfortunately, the
medical patient cured is a customer lost. As another example, in 1976, two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, PhD, and an associate, Ewan Cameron, M.D., did a published scientific study in Scotland that resulted in proving that Vitamin C, given by I.V., of 10 grams a day, could extend the average length of time a terminal cancer patient lives by six times or more. Had the medical community had any integrity, they would have quickly replicated his study, come to the same conclusion (because they did exactly what he did), and would have quickly started giving every cancer patient, terminal or otherwise, 10 grams of Vitamin C by I.V. every day. But that is not what happened. What really happened is that 3 studies were done at the Mayo Clinic, all of which were directly a result of the Pauling/Cameron study. However, these studies were not designed to replicate the Pauling/Cameron research. Instead they were designed to AVOID replicating the Pauling/Cameron protocol, AVOID their patient mix, and AVOID their statistical methods. Obviously, if you don't follow the same protocol, you won't get the same results. And they didn't. Here is what the American Cancer Society (ACS) says about this issue:
The ACS would have been insane to challenge the integrity of Linus Pauling (one of his Nobel Prizes was the Nobel Peace Prize, the other was in chemistry). So they quote the totally corrupt NIH (Note: 500 NIH employees were recently caught taking bribes from the pharmaceutical industry, which they called "outside consulting fees") and state that a world famous chemist, and two-time Nobel Prize winner, doesn't know how to design a scientific study!! But they also admit that the Mayo clinic did not use the same protocol as Pauling and Cameron. So if there are "still left questions," why hasn't the ACS used their annual scores of millions of dollars of income, and their political clout, to set the record straight and replicate the study as originally done? It has been more 30 years since the original study, yet no one in orthodox medicine, with their billions of dollars in research money, not even the ACS or NIH, has replicated the Pauling/Cameron study. It appears that extending the life expectancy of terminal cancer patients six-fold, using natural substances, is not important to orthodox medicine. In fact, two other studies did replicate the Pauling/Cameron study
far more closely than did the Mayo Clinic. Both of these studies verified
the Pauling/Cameron results. For more information, see: But this is just one of many, many instances where highly effective cancer treatments have been persecuted and/or ignored. There is, in fact, a pattern. A very clear pattern. The pattern is that if natural substances are involved, such as vitamin C, the study and evidence is persecuted and/or ignored. When natural substances are involved it is called "alternative medicine." It should be called "persecuted and/or ignored medicine." There are more than 300 alternative cancer treatments that use natural substances, such as Vitamin C. Every one of them is more effective than the Pauling/Cameron protocol. Every one of them is far more effective than chemotherapy and/or radiation. Every one of them is ignored and many of them have been persecuted. But there is a clear reason why natural substances are ignored. It has nothing to do with their effectiveness. The pharmaceutical industry cannot patent and control, and thus cannot profit from, natural substances. They can only charge their monopolistic prices on synthetic molecules, many of which are nothing but mutations of natural molecules. What is Going On In The Cancer Industry? The February 22, 2006 USA Today mentioned that by the year 2015, 20% of the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) could be for health spending. Now let's be logical. Suppose a cure for cancer was found; and suppose a treatment to avoid 90% of all heart disease problems was found; and suppose a cure for type 2 diabetes was found; and suppose a cure for AIDS/HIV was found. (In fact, all of these have been found.) Would health spending ever hit 20% of GDP? Of course not. All of these are highly profitable diseases for both the pharmaceutical industry and the medical industry (and the politicians who claim to represent their constituents). All the money being rasied for treating AIDS patients in Africa are benefiting no one but the pharmaceutical industry stockholders because a cure for AIDS/HIV has been around since 1990. So in essence, the article in U.S. Today was predicting that no cures for the highly profitable diseases would be found by the year 2015. That is a safe prediction!! Another safe prediction would be to predict that every new treatment for the profitable diseases will be more expensive and more profitable than existing treatments!! Here is another safe prediction, the 20% figure will be hit before 2015. Here is yet another safe prediction: the media will continue to suppress
alternative treatments for cancer, heart disease, dementia, diabetes,
etc. See this web site, you will be amazed at what alternative medicine
can already prevent and cure (and this website is just the tip of
the iceberg): Ask yourself this questions: "When was the last time orthodox medicine used their massive profits to find a cure for any disease?" When was the last time a cure for disease was found that used prescription drugs? If you said polio, you would be wrong. Polio was cured by a medical doctor in the 1940s, but the cure was suppressed because he used a form of Vitamin C, which drug companies could not patent and control. Have you ever wondered what would happen if someone found a cure for cancer? You probably think that the person finding the cure would be featured on every television show in America and would win a Nobel Prize in medicine. Kaali and Lyman, mentioned above, found a cure for AIDS / HIV, and more than 200 other diseases, and they didn't win a Nobel Prize. Have you ever heard of them before? It is difficult, if not impossible, to convince the average American that orthodox medicine today is not only corrupt, it is more corrupt than it has ever been in the history of medicine. That is saying a lot because orthodox medicine was persecuting cures for disease in the 1700s. With Big Money comes Big Corruption. The bigger the money the more the corruption. Unfortunately, there are some in alternative medicine who are also more interested in profits than their patients. The main difference between orthodox medicine and alternative medicine is freedom. The people with integrity in alternative medicine are allowed a great deal of freedom to help others. However, the Food and Drug Administration is always looking for excuses to crush the people who know how to cure diseases which are highly profitable to Big Pharma and Big Medicine (and thus Big Government). Nevertheless, in spite of some persecution, there are over 300 alternative cancer treatments that currently exist. Every one of them can cure some cases of cancer, if the person starts using that treatment immediately after being diagnosed. However, there is a very wide range in effectiveness between these treatments, especially when used on advanced cancer patients. The problem with alternative medicine is that patients are frequently on their own to find out which treatments work for their situation - and which don't work. Unlike orthodox medicine, which is very uniform across the country, alternative medicine is neither organized, nor uniform. The quest for truth is always a winding and rocky road, especially when money is involved. Some people erroneously think that medical doctors do not use the best alternative cancer treatments because the doctors do not know which treatments are really effective. While medical schools turn doctors into nothing but drug salesmen, that is not why medical doctors do not use natural substances in the treatment of disease. Medical doctors know how to read. But they also know that if they used a single one of these alternative cancer treatments on a single cancer patient, they would risk losing their license and could go to jail!! While it is this attitude that creates uniformity in orthodox medicine, it is also this attitude that crushes progress. Orthodox medicine is a highly controlled monopoly, totally controlled by the combination of Big Pharma and the American Medical Association. The suppression of truth by Big Medicine is why this website, and many other websites, exist. The major purpose of this website is to make information about alternative cancer treatments free and available to the public so that more and more people know which alternative cancer treatments are the strongest. Why Some Alternative Cancer Treatments
Are Far Superior That is definitely not a true statement, but even if it were true it would be an irrelevant issue! The key issue is whether patented drugs or Mother Nature's minerals and nutrients target cancer cells better. The fact of the matter is that chemotherapy does not target cancer cells. In fact, chemotherapy kills far, far more healthy cells than it does cancer cells. What this means is that chemotherapy must be given in very, very low doses, spread out over long periods of time, and the therapy must include gaps between the treatments. This "pacing" of the drugs is because too many healthy cells would be killed if too much chemotherapy were given too fast. The reason orthodox medicine treats cancer like a chronic disease is because orthodox treatments, in high doses, would kill the patient long before they would cure the cancer. This failure of orthodox medicine to safely kill cancer cells (i.e. safely target cancer cells) is why they talk about a "5 year cure rate" rather than a true cure rate. If they can keep the patient alive for 5 years they consider the patient to be "cured," even if they die in the sixth year. Mother Nature's cancer treatments, called natural cancer treatments, or more commonly "alternative cancer treatments," generally do absolutely no harm to healthy cells. This is because the human body, which was made by Mother Nature, knows exactly what to do with Mother Nature's minerals and nutrients. Virtually all natural treatments for cancer do not kill healthy cells - not a single one. This is the key - because alternative cancer treatments do not harm or kill healthy cells, the items from nature that can kill cancer cells can be given in much higher doses than chemotherapy - without any gaps in treatment!! Thus, even if the mutations of natural molecules, called drugs, were more potent at killing cancer cells than the original natural molecules, because of the superiority of natural substances at targeting cancer cells or leaving healthy cells healthy, alternative cancer treatments can be far more effective than orthodox drugs at treating cancer! Because Mother Nature does not necessarily condense the cancer-killing nutrients found in foods, some of the most potent of the alternative cancer treatments are liquid ionic minerals, certain types of ozone treatments, and other natural treatments that contain molecules that can be condensed, such as intravenous vitamin C (but not the Pauling/Cameron doses, however). Just how effective are the best treatments from Mother Nature? Several alternative cancer treatments have achieved a consistent 50% true cure rate on cancer patients who had been given up on by orthodox medicine and had been sent home to die! Such results are possible because these key alternative cancer treatments not only target cancer cells, they can be given in a very condensed and potent form, they do not need a catalyst, and they can be given safely in much higher doses than chemotherapy. Ponder that very carefully! Also ponder the true cure rate of these same treatments on cancer patients who use these treatments exclusively, meaning they had not lost many months of treatment time while being treated with orthodox treatments! However, do not assume every alternative cancer treatment is that effective. Very few of the 300+ alternative cancer treatments can come anywhere close to a 50% true cure rate on patients given up on by orthodox medicine. One of the big mistakes people who seek out alternative cancer treatments make is to assume that if an alternative cancer treatment will cure one patient, it will cure all cancer patients, no matter what condition they are in. This is a dangerous assumption because very, very few of the 300+ alternative cancer treatments are condensed and potent enough to cure 50% of those sent home to die by orthodox medicine. Very few. An Example of One of the Potent Alternative Cancer Treatments There are very few minerals that can get inside of cancer cells. Two of the minerals that can get inside of cancer cells are cesium and potassium. Once cesium gets inside of cancer cells it starts to "pull" potassium from the blood into the cancer cells (potassium supplementation is required when on this treatment in order to replenish the potassium in the blood that was pulled into the cancer cells). When there is enough build-up of cesium and/or potassium inside the cancer cell, glucose is blocked from getting into the cancer cell. Since glucose is what feeds the cancer cell, the cancer cell will eventually die from starvation. Not only that, but cesium and/or potassium will also block the cancer cells from making lactic acid, meaning they block the cachexia cycle at the cancer cell. Other items also help block or overcome the cachexia cycle in different ways (e.g. hydrazine sulfate blocks the cachexia cycle at the liver). Dr. A. Keith Brewer, PhD, discovered in the 1980s how cesium can treat cancer. Aside from treating the cancer, it can treat the pain of cancer within 12 to 36 hours, depending on what is causing the pain. The liquid ionic cesium chloride used today is much more potent than the cesium carbonate of the 1980s. The complete protocol includes several other items. Here is an article on this treatment:
Like all of the most potent alternative cancer treatments, this treatment is so potent at killing cancer cells it must be "paced," meaning dosages must be set so the body has time to safely remove the debris caused by the dead cancer cells. Did you notice that orthodox cancer treatments must be "paced" because of all the healthy cells that they kill. But alternative cancer treatments must be "paced" because of all the targeted cancer cells they kill. Because of the number of cancer cells killed by the cesium chloride / DMSO treatment, the cancer patient needs the expert advice of a vendor who knows how to safely use these products. Fortunately, such experts exist. In fact, all of the most potent alternative cancer treatments require expert advice over the telephone or in a clinic setting. For example, the ozone RHP and ozone liquid I.V. treatments require expert advice or a clinic setting. Also, these most potent treatments generally cannot be combined with each other (but they can be combined with some other alternative treatments). The doses for these products are designed to kill cancer cells at a rate that the body can safely handle the debris. To combine such treatments may create too high of a die-off rate. [Note: The list of alternative cancer treatments which can give a cancer patient (given up on by orthodox medicine) hope for survival can be found in the top section of the home page of this web site. Several of these treatments have articles written about them on this website.] More on Orthodox Cancer Treatments On top of that, even the 3% who do survive have had their bodies so severely damaged that they are vulnerable to future bouts with cancer. Here is what really happens to the typical cancer patient: Step 1) The patient goes to the doctor and is diagnosed with cancer, This cycle continues until the patient is sent home to die (of course, they are sent home to die after one more round of chemotherapy and radiation). Soon the patient dies. This is the cycle for virtually all cancer patients. The only difference between one patient and another is how many times the cycle is repeated. This is medicine? One hundred years from now the medical doctors of the day will look at the "medicine" of today in total and absolute disgust. There is absolutely no excuse for what is going on today in medicine. Even those who stop this nonsense and go with alternative medicine have severe problems. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery virtually destroy a person's immune system. A well put together natural treatment, on the other hand, which will actually include several different products which do different things, will actually build the person's immune system to make sure the cancer will not return. But alternative medicine cannot quickly mend an immune system that has been destroyed. That is why the most potent alternative cancer treatments do not take the time to fix the patient's immune system. The immune system is fixed during remission. But it gets worse. First, ninety-five percent of cancer patients who go with alternative cancer treatments have already been given up for dead by orthodox medicine. In other words, they first went to orthodox medicine, their body was destroyed by orthodox medicine, THEN they decided to go with alternative cancer treatments. Second, because so few alternative cancer treatments can cure people sent home to die by orthodox medicine, very few of the cancer patients sent home to die pick a treatment strong enough to give them a fighting chance. In other words, very few of these cancer patients pick one of the most potent alternative cancer treatments. These two things create a severe disadvantage for alternative medicine. Alternative medicine has lost between 1 and 4 years to treat the patient and build their immune system - because the patient was using orthodox treatments. In addition to that, after orthodox treatments, the patient is in far worse physical and mental condition than they were when they were first diagnosed. This is why there are so few alternative cancer treatments that can achieve a true cure rate of 50% on these patients. If we put all of this together we come to the following facts: Is it any wonder that deaths from cancer continue to rise in spite of the power of some of the alternative cancer treatments? So, what is the cure rate of recently diagnosed cancer patients who go with alternative medicine exclusively? It depends on how dangerous their cancer is and what treatment they pick. There are more than 300 alternative cancer treatments. If they pick the best possible treatment for their situation, when they are first diagnosed, a 90% or higher true cure rate is fairly easy to achieve. Overall, there are at least two dozen alternative cancer treatments that can come close to a 90% overall true cure rate across the board for those who use alternative cancer treatments exclusively. The amazing thing is that orthodox medicine has had its own opportunities to have its own 90% cure rate. There are two incredible substances that allow chemotherapy to safely target cancer cells: insulin and DMSO. Insulin allows small amounts of chemotherapy to target cancer cells because of the way it works with the cell membranes. The treatment is called Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT). DMSO actually binds to small amounts of certain chemotherapy drugs. The DMSO, which has a very high affinity for cancer cells, then pulls the chemotherapy into the cancer cells with it. On this website, this treatment is called DMSO Potentiation Therapy (DPT). DPT and IPT are two treatments that are easy to combine. It is a very potent treatment. But don't ask your oncologist about it, he or she has probably never heard of it. Because these two treatments use very low doses of chemotherapy (about 1/10th a normal dose), and because the chemotherapy targets the cancer cells, these two treatments are very potent and have virtually no side-effects. But orthodox medicine does not use their own discoveries! They would
rather have a 3% cure rate than a 90% cure rate!! See this article
about these two substances: So, if this is true, and it is true, why haven't you heard this on television a hundred times during your lifetime? Why don't movie stars, "investigative journalists," etc. constantly tout the vast superiority of alternative cancer treatments? Why You Haven't Heard These Things Before Everything you hear throughout your life is not based on who has the most truth, it is based on who has the most money. If you haven't figured that out by now, you better figure it out real quick. The average American knows absolutely nothing about alternative cancer treatments except rumors about people who probably used the wrong treatment. Let us consider the reasons for this lack of accurate and useful information about alternative cancer treatments with the following list of facts: Fact #1) Virtually every American gets the vast majority of their information directly or indirectly from the media, which includes television, radio, newspapers, magazines, etc. Only the Internet, books and emails would not be considered part of the "media." Fact #2) The pharmaceutical industry spends $3 billion a year advertising in the media. Fact #3) In the 1940s, the book: The Drug Story was published by newspaper owner Morris Bealle. This book exposed the vast corruption in the media due to advertising dollars. In other words, it exposed why newspapers (this was before television) refused to tell the truth about corruption in corporations due to their fear of losing advertising dollars to these same corrupt corporations. However, it was well known long before the 1940s that advertising money bought influence with the media. Actually, this was known no later than the 1880s. In other words, for more than 100 years the media has clearly understood that if you say things in the media that are true, but cut into the profits of your advertisers, you will quickly lose not only your advertising revenue from that company, but possibly from many other companies as well (who also fear any type of honesty). Consider this quote by a famous journalist to a group of other journalists,
given in the 1880s:"There is no such thing, at this date of the
world's history [1880], in America, as an independent press. You know
it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your
honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would
never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion
out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar
salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish
as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for
another job. We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are
the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents,
our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men.
We are intellectual prostitutes." Absolutely nothing has changed since the 1880s. Fact #4) As a result of the above item, and the $3 billion a year spent by the pharmaceutical industry in the media, American journalists are required to publicly be highly, highly loyal to the pharmaceutical industry. A single verbal slip by a journalist on or off the air could cost him or her their job. Prior approval by the advertisers is required to say anything mildly negative about the pharmaceutical industry. These same rules apply to most major industries, not just the pharmaceutical industry. Fact #5) The orthodox cancer treatments (e.g. surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and many others) used in "modern" medicine are equally subservient to the pharmaceutical industry. Actually, "modern" medicine was corrupt long before the pharmaceutical industry took over the medical schools many decades ago. Medical doctors, who are under the control of the American Medical Association, are not allowed to use any natural substance in the treatment of cancer. Modern "doctors" are taught nothing but medicine using prescription drugs. Medical doctors are only allowed to use natural substances in the treatment of the symptoms of prescription drugs. This is called "complementary alternative medicine" or CAM. CAM is not designed to treat any disease! Because of the money of the pharmaceutical industry: the medical community, the media and the politicians are all subservient to the pharmaceutical industry. All are in the same bed together. There are many books that have been written on these subjects. Fact #6) While vitamin companies can advertise in the media, the substances which are used in the most potent natural or alternative cancer treatments are never advertised in the media. Thus, the media receives $0 dollars of advertising related to viable alternative cancer treatments. Thus, there is a $3 billion dollar difference between what the pharmaceutical industry spends on advertising and what is spent for the main substances used in alternative cancer treatments. There is an equally proportional difference in the opinions you gather from watching or reading the media. Fact #7) Taking all of the above items into account, is it any wonder that the average American hears nothing good about alternative cancer treatments anywhere in the media, but hears hundreds or thousands of good things about orthodox medicine in the media every year (thousands if you include pharmaceutical advertisements). You might not remember hearing anything good about orthodox medicine. Every time you watch a role-playing show on television that glorifies a doctor or hospital you are being indoctrinated. Every time you hear a news program that implies you should go to your orthodox doctor for some problem, you are being indoctrinated. Every time you hear a pharmaceutical ad you are being indoctrinated. But you never hear anything positive about alternative cancer treatments. This is by design. An Even Bigger Reason For The Great Deception For example, as this article is being written, General Electric owns 80% of the NBC network. General Electric also owns 14 major NBC affiliates. General Electric's partner, Telemundo (which owns the other 20% of NBC), owns 16 major television stations. By the way, GE now owns Telemundo. Why is this significant? General Electric has a major division called: "GE Healthcare." This division includes "GE Medical Systems Information Technologies," "GE Healthcare Cintricity Pharmacy" (which has sold about 6 billion prescriptions) and other orthodox health related organizations. All of these organizations, and many more, are heavily involved in orthodox medicine. Thus, the same company, General Electric, has major ownership in both the media and orthodox medicine. CBS has a longstanding advertising policy that prohibits the sale of advertising time for the advocacy of viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance. In other words, they can censor any advertisement they want. So much for freedom of the press. The press has the freedom, but not the people. A local FOX station in Florida fired two of its reporters, Jane Akre and Steve Wilson, for refusing to back down on an investigative reporting segment that exposed Monsanto chemical company for adding a toxic chemical, BGH, which causes cancer, to milk. The national FOX network has stood solidly behind the Florida station. Are you surprised? For decades the 3 major television networks were so liberal that they were no longer able to control the conservatives. Something had to be done to manipulate and keep the conservatives from figuring out what was going on in Washington. In 1985, the Fox Network was founded with the main purpose of controlling the conservatives by diverting their attention from the real corruption in Washington and focusing the attention of the conservatives on unimportant issues that would not threaten the profits of the main conspiracy. All of what has been said is just the tip of the iceberg. There is the issue of cross-board of directors control, such as between large cancer research clinics and pharmaceutical companies. There is also the issue that 42 U.S. Senators (42%) own stock in the pharmaceutical industry. Then there is the issue of the revolving door between the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry. There is the issue discovered by a Los Angeles Times investigation that found out more than 500 employees of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were receiving bribes (i.e. "outside consulting fees") from the pharmaceutical industry. When the head of the NIH slapped a one year moratorium on these bribes (because they got caught, not because of any modicum of integrity), he was jeered by the crowd of NIH employees. Follow the money trail, it all leads back to the pharmaceutical industry and American Medical Association (AMA). Now you know why the government and the AMA don't want you to know the whole truth about your cancer treatment options. Now you know why medical doctors are not allowed to use natural substances in the treatment of cancer EVEN AFTER a person is sent home to die. Ponder that one carefully!! If alternative medicine is capable of having a consistent cure rate of 90% or more, on newly diagnosed cancer patients, then clearly orthodox medicine is also capable of having a 90% true cure rate on newly diagnosed cancer patients if doctors were allowed to use natural substances in the treatment of disease. That is exactly why they are not allowed to use alternative medicine to treat disease. The 3% cure rate treatments are so much more profitable than the 90% cure rate treatments, that the "leaders" of orthodox medicine have intentionally chosen to suppress the far superior alternative cancer treatments. If medical doctors were allowed to use alternative medicine on cancer patients they sent home to die, they could cure 50% of them. That would lead to questions of why the alternative cancer treatment was not used first! That is why medical doctors are not allowed to use alternative medicine even after the pharmaceutical industry and doctors already have their money and the patient is sent home to die! This point is so important it cannot be made often enough. After orthodox medicine has all the money they can get from a cancer patient, the individual medical doctor is still not allowed to cure the patient with alternative medicine. This is the most telling fact of all in the battle between orthodox and alternative medicine. It would be too embarrassing to orthodox medicine for their cancer patients to be cured with alternative medicine after the orthodox treatments failed! So to avoid the embarassment, they stand back and watch their patients die a painful death. While individual doctors may or may not know what is going on, and may or may not be at fault for what is going on, it is clear that the individual medical doctors can be severely criticized for not having the guts to clean house within the national and state AMA boards and stand up for their patient's health. They can also be severely criticized for not desiring to learn more about alternative cancer treatments. Most doctors don't want to "rock the boat." What you hear from the "cancer industry" and the media does not come from anyone who is concerned about your health (or your life), what you hear comes from people who care about their personal assets. What you hear is controlled very carefully by a wide network of cross-controlled organizations and advertising money. Indeed, those of us who are interested in telling people about their cancer treatment options feel as the reformer Upton Sinclair felt in 1919:
A Summary 1) Because of greed and corruption, orthodox medicine uses the most profitable treatments for cancer, thus their true cure rate is around 3%. 2) The true cure rate of orthodox medicine could easily be 90% or higher if they used the most effective orthodox cancer treatments or the most effective alternative cancer treatments. 3) Because of a wide variety of problems, but mainly because most cancer patients go with orthodox cancer treatments first, the true cure rate of alternative medicine is unknown, but it is probably around 10% to 15%. 4) Like orthodox medicine, the true cure rate of alternative cancer treatments could be 90% or higher if newly diagnosed cancer patients went with alternative cancer treatments instead of orthodox cancer treatments and they found and used the most effective of the alternative cancer treatments for their situation. 5) Thus, orthodox medicine and alternative medicine have essentially the same potential, especially if orthodox medicine used the best of the alternative cancer treatments. But a medical doctor stands at risk of losing their medical license, and possibly going to jail, should they use the most effective cancer treatments, either orthodox or alternative. Thus, going with orthodox cancer treatments is almost always a mistake, because of the corruption in modern medicine. 6) Thus, for a newly diagnosed cancer patient, because they have the option to use alternative cancer treatments, and the freedom to do their homework on the Internet and in the right books, their only hope of achieving a high chance of survival is to use alternative cancer treatments. In short, the war between alternative cancer treatments and orthodox cancer treatments has nothing to do with science, it is a war of information and freedom. From a scientific standpoint, if the right treatment is chosen for a given situation, and the patient avoids orthodox medicine (except in rare situations), because of the corruption of orthodox medicine, alternative cancer treatments are far superior. But the side that wins the most cancer patients is the side with the most money. In other words, because they are corrupt, Big Pharma and Big Medicine have the most money and the most influence over the media (who are essentially owned and controlled by the same people who own and control the pharmaceutical industry), thus almost all newly diagnosed cancer patients choose the worst possible option because the media has suppressed the truth, deceived them into thinking current orthodox medicine is wonderful and brainwashed them into picking their worst possible option. Medicine is not a "healing art," it is a business. Their goal is not to cure people, but to maximize their profits. Cancer is one of the key diseases that is a "goose that lays golden eggs" for orthodox medicine. No one wants to kill that goose. More than one million Americans die every year of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, etc., when they could have been cured or their disease could easily have been prevented. Instead of being told the truth, the truth is suppressed and replaced with false hopes, deceptive statistics and pressure. God will judge those who are responsible and God cannot be bribed. Part 2 of this article will go into great detail about the "Great Deception" and Part 3 of this article will detail the politics involved in the Great Deception.
Part 3 - The Politics
See also: Cancer - Step Outside the Box Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.
This article may be downloaded, stored on the internet, printed, or
emailed to others, as long as it is not modified in any way and this
copyright notice remains intact. |
|
|
|
|About Us | Album
| Interview | Articles
| Links | Breeders
Showcase | GREAT Great Danes
| Linda's Artwork
| Email: Copyright © 2002-2003 GREATDANELADY.COM |